• Olaya I, Burgess SM, Rog O.J Formation and resolution of meiotic chromosome entanglements and interlocks (2024) J. Cell Sci. Jul 1;137(13):jcs262004. [Full Text]

 

  • Takemoto, T Nishimura, T Kawasaki, Y Imai, K Levy, N Hart, I Olaya, .. (2023) In Vitro Storage of Functional Sperm at Room Temperature in Zebrafish and Medaka K. Zebrafish 20 (6), 229-235 [Full Text]

 

  • Olaya I, and Burgess SM (2022) When the anchor’s away, meiotic telomeres go astray (2022)Dev. Cell. Volume 57, issue 13, P1563-1565 DOI:[Full Text] Spotlight on Paper: Control of meiotic chromosomal bouquet and germ cell morphogenesis by the zygotene cilium [Full Text]

 

  • Komachi K and Burgess SM (2022) The Nup2 meiotic-autonomous region relieves inhibition of Nup60 to promote progression of meiosis and sporulation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Genetics 221 (1), iyac045 [Full Text]

 

  • Newman TAC ,  Beltran B,  McGehee JM,   Elnatan D,  Cahoon CK … Spakowitz A, and Burgess SM (2022) Diffusion and distal linkages govern interchromosomal dynamics during meiotic prophase Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 119 (12), e2115883119 [Full Text]

 

  • Imai, Y., Olaya, I, Sakai, N. and Burgess SM. (2021) Meiotic chromosome dynamics and zebrafish. Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.757445 [Full Text]

 

  • Blokhina YP, Frees, MA, Nguyen AD, Draper BW and Burgess SM. (2021) Rad21l1 cohesin subunit is dispensable for spermatogenesis but not oogenesis in zebrafish. PLoS Genetics. 1009127  [Full Text]

 

  • Blokhina YP, Olaya I, Burgess SM. (2020) Preparation of Meiotic Chromosome Spreads from Zebrafish Spermatocytes. J Vis Exp. 2020;(157):10.3791/60671. doi:10.3791/60671 [Full Text]

 

  • Pouokam M, Cruz B, Burgess S, Segal MR, Vazquez M, Arsuaga J. (2019) “The Rabl configuration limits topological entanglement of chromosomes in budding yeast.” Sci Rep. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-42967-4. [Full Text]

 

  • Blokhina, Y.P., Nguyen, A.N., Draper, B.W., and Burgess, S.M. (2019) “The telomere bouquet is a hub where meiotic double-strand breaks, synapsis, and stable homolog juxtaposition are coordinated in the zebrafish , Danio rerio.” PLoS genetics 15(1): e10007730. [Full Text]

 

  • Burgess, SM, Powers T, and Mell JC. (2017) Budding Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a Model Genetic Organism. 2017. In: eLS. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd: Chichester. DOI: 10.1002/9780470015902 [Full Text]

 

  • Chu, DB, Gromova T, Newman, TAC, and Burgess, SM (2017) “The Nucleoporin Nup2 Contains a Meiotic-Autonomous Region that Promotes the Dynamic Chromosome Events of Meiosis.” Genetics 206(3). [Full Text]

 

  • Chu, DB and Burgess, SM (2016) “A computational approach to estimating nondisjunction frequency in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.” G3: Genes| Genomes| Genetics 3-115. [Full Text]

 

  • Schuster, K, Leeke, B, Meier, M, Wang, Y, Newman, T, Burgess, SM and Horsfield, JA (2015) “A neural crest origin for cohesinopathy heart defects.” Human molecular genetics 24(24):7005-7016. [Full Text]

 

  • Lui, DY., Cahoon, CK and Burgess, SM (2013) “Multiple opposing constraints govern chromosome interactions during meiosis.” PLoS genetics 9.1 : e1003197. [Full Text]

 

  • Ho HC, Burgess SM. (2011) Pch2 acts through Xrs2 and Tel1/ATM to modulate interhomolog bias and checkpoint function during meiosis. PLoS Genetics. 7(11):e1002351. [Full Text]

 

  • Wu HY, Ho HC, Burgess SM (2010) Mek1 kinase governs outcomes of meiotic recombination and the checkpoint response. Curr Biol. 20(19):1707-16. [Full Text]

 

  • Lui D, Burgess SM (2009) Measurement of spatial proximity and accessibility of chromosomal loci in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using Cre/loxP site-specific recombination. Methods Mol Biol. 557:55-63. Review. [Full Text]

 

  • Mell, JC, Wienholz BL, Salem AA, and Burgess, SM (2008) Sites of recombination are local determinants of meiotic homolog pairing in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 179, 773-784. [ Full Text ]

 

  • Mell, JC, Komachi, K, Hughes, O and Burgess, S (2008) Cooperative interactions between pairs of homologous chromatids during meiosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 179, 1125-1127. [ Full Text ]

 

  • Burgess, S.M. (2007). Use of performance art to teach chromosome biology in large-enrollment genetics courses. Genetics 4: 2.

 

  • Wu HY, Burgess SM. (2006) Two distinct surveillance mechanisms monitor meiotic chromosome metabolism in budding yeast. Curr Biol. 16(24):2473-9. [Full Text]

 

  • Lui DY, Peoples-Holst TL, Mell JC, Wu HY, Dean E, Burgess SM. (2006) Analysis of close stable homolog juxtaposition during meiosis in mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae . Genetics. 173(3):1207-22. Epub 2006 Apr 30. [ Full Text ]

 

  • Wu HY, Burgess, SM. (2006) Ndj1, a telomere associated protein, promotes meiotic recombination in budding yeast. Mol Cell Biol. 26(10):3683-94. [ Full Text ]

 

  • Peoples-Holst TL, Burgess SM. (2005) Multiple branches of the meiotic recombination pathway contribute independently to homolog pairing and stable juxtaposition during meiosis in budding yeast. Genes Dev. 19(7):863-74. [ Full Text ]

 

  • Burgess SM. (2004) Homolog pairing in S. pombe: the ends are the means. Mol Cell . 13(6):766-8. [ Full Text ]

 

  • Mell JC, Burgess SM. (2003) Yeast as a Model Genetic Organism. In: Nature Encyclopedia of Life Sciences , London: Nature Publishing Group.

 

  • Peoples TL, Dean EW, Gonzalez O, Lambourne L, Burgess SM. (2002)  Close, stable homolog juxtaposition during meiosis in budding yeast is dependent on meiotic recombination, occurs independent of synapsis and is distinct from DSB-independent pairing contacts. Genes Dev. 16(13):1682-95. [ Full Text ]

 

  • Burgess, SM. (2002). Homologous chromosome associations and nuclear organization in the budding yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae. In: “Homology effects” Edited by C-ting Wu and J. Dunlap. Advances in Genetics Volume 46. Academic Press. San Diego pp. 49-90. [Full Text]

 

  • Burgess SM, Kleckner N. (1999) Collisions between yeast chromosomal loci in vivo are governedby three layers of organization. Genes Dev. 13(14):1871-83. [ Full Text ]

 

  • Burgess SM, Kleckner N, Weiner BM. (1999) Somatic pairing of homologs in budding yeast: existence and modulation. Genes Dev. 13(12):1627-41. [ Full Text ]

 

  • Burgess SM, Ajimura A, Kleckner N. (1999) GCN5 -dependent histone H3 acetylation and RPD3 -dependent histone H4 deacetylation have distinct, opposing effects on IME2 transcription, during meiosis and during vegetative growth, in budding yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 96(12):6835-40. [ Full Text ]

 

  • Burgess SM, Guthrie C. (1993) Beat the clock: Paradigms for NTPases in the maintenance of biological fidelity. Trends Biochem Sci. 18(10):381-4. Review. [ Full Text ]

 

  • Burgess SM, Guthrie C. (1993) A mechanism to enhance mRNA splicing Fidelity: The RNA-dependent ATPase Prp16 governs the use of a discard pathway for aberrant lariat intermediates. Cell. 73(7):1377-91. [ Full Text ]

 

  • Burgess S, Couto J, Guthrie C. (1990) A putative ATP-binding protein influences the fidelity of branch point recognition in yeast splicing. Cell. 60(5):705-17. [ Full Text ]

 

  • Wood, W., Trent, C., Meneely, P., Manser, J. and Burgess, S. (1987).Control of X-chromosome expression and sex determination in embryos of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetic Regulation in Development. R. Liss and Co. pp. 191-199.

 

  • Jefferson, R.A., Burgess, S.M. and Hirsh, D. (1986).  Beta-glucuronidase from Escherichia coli as a gene-fusion marker. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 83: 8447-8451.[ Full Text ]